Daejeon Arts Center Art Hall Classical

Daejeon Seo-gu1,546 seats · 19 sectionsOfficial seating plan and stage drawingEnsemble listening (estimated) pick: 1F A Seat 1

Daejeon Arts Center Art Hall seat view and sound experience

Estimated acoustics · Ensemble listening

Share the same seats and scene

Includes A/B seats, recommendation criteria, view settings and playback position. Personal videos are not included.

Sound experience

Preparing your seat view
A1F A · Seat 1
Drag to look around · Scroll or pinch to zoom
Sample performance00:00 / 00:24

About the sound

Headphones recommended

Strings, woodwinds and brass together · Direction and distance change with your seat.

Direct sound is combined with early reflections and reverberation. Their proportions change with the seat. This is a synthesis based on assumptions, not a recording of the actual hall.

Acoustic sources and model scope

Statistical model · Not measured

Ensemble listening estimates direct sound from five equally loud representative instruments plus early and late reflected energy. It does not trace individual wall reflections or measure sound on site. Playback uses the same energy model, but the samples' instrumentation and volume differ from the equal-strength scoring assumption. Changing a sample does not change the recommendation criteria.

Reverberation time used
1.9s Operator-reported T30 · reflectors installed · 500 Hz · mean of 12 positions
Room volume used
20,098m³ Assumed from the 3D shell (bounded to 8–13 m³ per seat) · actual volume unconfirmed

We also check score variation under nine assumptions: reverberation time ±0.4 seconds and volume ±20%. Balcony obstruction, reflector placement, and instrument directivity are not included. Scores cannot rank sound quality across venues.

Acoustic method and limitations
Zoom
To stage centerApprox. 15m
Person's angular size6.7°
Downward viewing angle-3°
Viewing heightApprox. 1.2m

Model calculations from the selected seat to the reference point. A larger angular size means the person appears larger.

A/B score comparison

Based on Estimated acoustics · Ensemble listening
A1F A Seat 193pts
Estimated acoustics · Ensemble listening
93pts
View · Balanced
70pts
Clarity–reverberation balance 40%92
Instrument delivery balance 25%92
Sound energy adequacy 35%94

Lowest component: Clarity–reverberation balance, 92 pts. Weaker components influence the combined score; scenarios range from 62 to 98 pts.

Scores rise when all three criteria are met together. Weights indicate importance; weaker components have more influence on the combined score.

Ensemble estimate: 62–98 pts

These are nine calculations with different assumed reverberation times and room volumes. Actual quality is not guaranteed to fall within this range, and a few points do not establish which seat is better.

Clarity–reverberation ratio (C80)
0.5 dB
Sound strength (G)
3.9 dB

These values come from a statistical model, not measurements. C80 is assessed against a chosen balance range rather than rewarding higher values; G is assessed for sufficient strength. View calculation criteria

B1F E Seat 991pts
Estimated acoustics · Ensemble listening
91pts
View · Balanced
83pts
Clarity–reverberation balance 40%99
Instrument delivery balance 25%97
Sound energy adequacy 35%80

Lowest component: Sound energy adequacy, 80 pts. Weaker components influence the combined score; scenarios range from 57 to 97 pts.

Scores rise when all three criteria are met together. Weights indicate importance; weaker components have more influence on the combined score.

Ensemble estimate: 57–97 pts

These are nine calculations with different assumed reverberation times and room volumes. Actual quality is not guaranteed to fall within this range, and a few points do not establish which seat is better.

Clarity–reverberation ratio (C80)
-0.1 dB
Sound strength (G)
3.0 dB

These values come from a statistical model, not measurements. C80 is assessed against a chosen balance range rather than rewarding higher values; G is assessed for sufficient strength. View calculation criteria

To stage centerA 15.1m · B 21.1m
Viewing heightA 1.2m · B 2.5m
Person's angular sizeA 6.7° · B 4.8°
DifferenceA is about 6 m closer.

Ensemble listening uses assumed direct sound, early reflections, and late reverberation. Direct-sound preference is distance-based; view scores use distance, overview, and alignment. Reflectors, balcony obstruction, and instrument directivity are not modeled, so rear-seat acoustics may also be overestimated. How to read the scores

Comparing seats at Daejeon Arts Center Art Hall

Compare stage views and strings, bass or full orchestra sound in A/B. Ensemble listening scores are acoustic model estimates, not on-site measurements. Find tickets by floor, block and number. Display rows organize the diagram and are not official ticket rows. The125 OP seats depend on the show. Six red-marked positions are inferred accessible spaces and excluded from chair selection; check current venue arrangements.

Guide to seats, scores and sound

How this experience was built

Seat coordinatesOfficial seating plan and stage drawing
Official capacity1,546 seats (1F1,039 including125 OP · 2F229 · 3F278 · includes6 accessible places)
Eye heightDefault: 1.18 m above the seat (adjustable from 0.95–1.75 m)
Figure height1.75m (used to calculate angular size)
SoundSpatial audio samples

What sources confirm — The operator’s three seat maps contain1,546 block-number identities. The2016 Daejeon Development Institute report distinguishes1,540 ordinary and6 accessible places. Together with six red-marked current-map positions this supports modeling1,540 chairs, including125 show-dependent OP seats. Published stage dimensions are18×15m with a17.1m-wide,11.3m-high opening. Central floor profiles from the public2018 CAD are matched to the current inventory.

What remains estimated — 3D positions and current row-to-section correspondence are estimated. Diagram pixels use roughly0.53m chair and1m row spacing; apron origin, side heights,1m stage,0m OP floor, walls, ceiling and rails are assumed. Interpreting red E125–127/G121–123 as accessible spaces is an inference from counts and shape, not an explicit current-map wheelchair label. A Chrome-viewed H10-range review checks only lateral sightline and visible stage floor; unknown exact seat, lens and cropping prevent FOV measurement. Official reflector-on500Hz T30 of1.9s, averaged over12 positions, is a hall reference; occupancy and measurement year are unstated and this is not current seat-specific sound measurement. The51 players are illustrative.

Views are calculated using a 1.75 m figure, your chosen eye height and seat coordinates. Actual obstructions from people, railings or equipment and show-specific layouts may not be represented. Orchestral sound combines direction, distance and assumed early reflections and reverberation. It does not use responses measured in the actual hall. Scores indicate preference fit; actual obstructions, sound quality and price are not yet included.

Orchestral audio: original samples made from VSCO 2 CE recordings (Versilian Studios, CC0). Band and game sounds are synthesized. Crowd audio uses Sandermotions’ CC0 recordings, not recordings from this venue.